The Never Trump voice vote at the GOP convention was really close.
Chaos erupted on the floor of the Quicken Loans Arena earlier today when Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), in his capacity as the convention’s deputy permanent chair, called the assembled delegates to a voice vote. The issue at hand: Whether to accept the party rules drawn up last Friday by the RNC rules committee. Last week, the committee successfully fought off the Never Trump movement’s attempt to alter party rules to allow delegates to vote for the candidate of their choice rather than for the candidate to which they were bound by primary and caucus wins, a long-plotted move calculated to draw pledged delegates away from Donald Trump.
After the rules committee rejected Never Trump delegates’ so-called “conscience clause,” pre-convention reports had all but elegized the GOP holdouts, effectively declaring their effort dead on arrival. But the chorus of cheers, jeers, and boos that accompanied Womack’s call for a voice vote momentarily reinvigorated the movement’s malcontents.
The ayes (for adopting the rules) hollered, the nays (against) groused, and Womack basically cupped his hand to his ear and decided the vote “in the opinion of the chair” went for the ayes—in favor of the rules.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe result was a foregone conclusion. Womack was never going to suffer a serious challenge to Trump’s ascendance—he’d already pooh-poohed a roll call vote that would have required delegates to vote individually for or against party rules.
But just how close did the Never Trump nays get? Slatedid some detective work to find out.
First, the basics: A voice vote essentially consists of screaming as loud as possible when your preferred faction is called. The chorus of ayes meant a vote for the rules. The cacophony of nays meant a vote against the rules in a last-ditch procedural measure to unseat Trump. Since there’s no way of knowing precisely how many are voting aye or nay, a voice vote is decided subjectively based which side seems louder.
AdvertisementTo figure out which bloc really earned the win, Mickey Capper, one of Slate’s podcast producers, ran the audio from the convention through a program called REAPER. The program allowed us to visualize the auditory peaks and troughs that map onto the yells, whoops, and silences of the crowd. Here’s the visual map of the vote that resulted:
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWe then color-coded the visual to correspond to who was making noise at any given time. Yellow indicates Womack speaking, red signals those voting in favor of the rules shouting “aye,” and blue telegraphs those voting “nay.” The clip begins with Womack’s call to vote, followed by the sound of the ayes. Womack then calls for the nay vote, after which he pronounces the “ayes” the winners. We also included a fourth category, in purple, that corresponds to the reaction of the crowd after Womack called the vote in favor of the rules. The two outlier spikes that occur about 25 seconds into the minute-long clip represent the sound of Womack’s gavel following the “aye” vote.
AdvertisementBased on our analysis, Womack’s ears weren’t wrong: The “ayes” have it.
But they didn’t win by much. REAPER’s comparison of the volume and loudness of the “aye” and the “nay” votes, both visual and measured in decibels, indicates that the vote was close—very close. REAPER registered a 0.5 decibel difference between the peak of the “aye” vote (which, apart from Womack’s gaveling, was the loudest single moment in the clip and clocked in around -5.6 dB) and the peak of the “nay” vote (approximately -6.1 dB). It also registered about a one-decibel difference in sustained loudness between the two votes, with the “aye” votes taking the cake. (For a more comprehensive and technical explanation of what exactly a decibel is and how in the world they can register as negative values, we direct you here and here).
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementMickey interpreted the results of our data to me this way: Even though the “ayes” clearly won, if someone angrily asked you to turn down a too-loud television and you decreased its volume by one decibel, they’d tell you to turn it down again. It’s tough to imagine Womack’s auditory sensitivity was keen enough to detect a substantial difference in volume.
AdvertisementFurthermore, there are other aspects of our audiovisual display that look fishy if Womack’s goal was to appear impartial in calling the vote. It’s clear that Womack allowed the “ayes” to whoop, holler, and exercise in favor of the rules for about 18 seconds—two and a half times as long as he gave nay-voting delegates to do the same. This means Womack cut off “nay” voters before they could enjoy the same second-breath bump in volume that their “aye” counterparts were able to belt out after briefly trailing off around the 12-second mark. Because of the difficulty of picking up on a difference of just one decibel, it’s easy to imagine the question tipping the other way had Womack called for the “nay” vote first.
Nevertheless, the ayes, the RNC rules committee, and, by extension, Trump himself emerged victorious. But only just. The biggest takeaway? Voice voting is a pretty stupid way to figure out anything having to do with who becomes president.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:资讯)
- 10 Big Misconceptions About Computer Hardware
- U.S. vows to use 'all the tools at our disposal' to pressure N. Korea
- Kardashian Klan returns to social media following Kim's robbery
- Mom uses Halloween costumes to help 3
- [Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- 9 Festive Holiday Treats and Where to Find Them
- NFL to fine teams up to $100,000 for posting social media video during games
- 焦点访谈丨护航高考 助力学子圆梦(雅安篇)
- Leipzig frustrate PSG with last
- Travel Back in Time and Uncover Old
- Fritz sets up Djokovic clash in Paris
- How Facebook might take on the Amazon Echo
- Medvedev puts Djokovic’s record on hold
-
Bernie Sanders’ DNC speech sounded like everyone else’s. That’s astonishing.
So far, the Democratic National Convention has been filled with era-marking oratory. The first night ...[详细] -
Park: Labor bills open to debate
President Park Geun-hye said Tuesday that the government is open for further discussions with unions ...[详细] -
Park held brief discussion with Abe on trilateral summit
South Korean President Park Geun-hye met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe Sunday, Cheong Wa D ...[详细] -
Medvedev puts Djokovic’s record on hold
PARIS:Novak Djokovic's hopes of ending the season as world number one for a record seventh time ...[详细] -
“精致小春姐”顾春芳:华丽白西装、镶钻水晶拖鞋,带来新兴凉果No.1
“精致小春姐”顾春芳:华丽白西装、镶钻水晶拖鞋,带来新兴凉果No.1_南方+_南方plus“欢迎收听广东‘讲错’电台编外节目之广东省第一届农事运动会乡村直播大赛......”来自云浮市新兴县的村播“精 ...[详细] -
把握时“机”!广东省现代农业装备研究院加速科研成果转化落地_南方+_南方plus农机争鸣,五谷丰登。7月13日,伴随着阵阵轰鸣的引擎声,2024年广联经销商战略沟通会在广州拉开帷幕。来自广东、广西、江 ...[详细]
-
Team will dedicate T20 World Cup to Asif Ali’s late daughter
Pakistan recently played four intense T20 matches and emerged victorious against teams that put up a ...[详细] -
Ruling, opposition parties narrow differences over election rules
Heads of the ruling and major opposition parties in South Korea said Monday that they made some head ...[详细] -
13 Unbelievable Underwater Wonders in Florida
A must for any aquatic adventurer is a visit to the City of Mermaids at Weeki Wachee, which offers a ...[详细] -
North Korea taps communist party official as state security chief
North Korea has appointed a senior communist party official as its new state security chief as part ...[详细]