The new Jan. 6 testimony against Trump will be devastating at trial.
On Sunday, ABC News reported on new evidence now in the hands of special counsel Jack Smith that signals a turning point for the prosecution against Donald Trump. If and when the trial goes forward after Trump’s immunity appeals wrap up, the new evidence will be kryptonite to Trump’s hopes for avoiding a conviction.
Progress toward the trial is currently paused during Trump’s appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Experts like Norm Eisen expect that Trump’s weak appellate claims to immunity and purported protection from double jeopardy are likely to be resolved against him well in time for a trial before the November election.
ABC’s latest reporting describes Smith’s interviews with Trump’s close aides, like Dan Scavino, Trump’s communications guru. The interviews put firmly on record Trump’s statements during the three hours on Jan. 6 when he refused like a petulant child to ask the Capitol invaders to go home.
The powerful reported testimony goes straight to the crucial issue in the case: Did Trump criminally intend to overturn the 2020 election? His newly reported statements would conclusively establish for any reasonable juror that Trump wanted the siege to succeed in stopping Congress from certifying President Joe Biden’s election.
Related From Slate
Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern
The Supreme Court Will Decide if Trump Can Run for President. It’s Not Ready for the Fallout.
Read MoreWe already knew about Trump resisting the entreaties of aides, family, and political allies who begged him, once violence began, to immediately call off the dogs of insurrection. He fiddled for 187 minutes while Rome burned.
So what’s new about the evidence that ABC reported Sunday?
AdvertisementTrump’s reported statements are loaded with cruelty, self-interest, and abandonment of allies. It becomes indisputable that he was using his most violent followers to try to override the voters’ will and keep himself in power.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe statements that ABC reported are new, in part, because witnesses like Scavino and Mark Meadows, the Trump White House chief of staff, didn’t speak with the House Jan. 6 committee.
Scavino still works for Trump’s campaign. Per ABC, he’s been so close and “so supportive of Trump over the years that … in 2020 … Trump joked that … Scavino was ‘the most powerful man in politics.’ ” That will make his testimony especially compelling.
Scavino has now reportedly confirmed something vital to Smith—that it was Trump and Trump alone who posted his infamous 2:24 p.m. Jan. 6 tweet: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done.” The Wall Street Journal has called that tweet “the critical moment” of the siege because it poured truckloads of kerosene onto an already roaring fire inside the Capitol.
AdvertisementScavino reportedly told Smith’s team that Trump only posted the tweet after Scavino left him by himself in the White House dining room, Scavino having failed “to persuade Trump to release a calming statement.” After the posting, multiple aides returned to tell Trump that the tweet was “not what we need.”
Trump reportedly responded, with no concern for the tweet’s inciting effect: “But it’s true.” As Nick Luna, now a former Trump aide, reportedly told investigators, Trump “showed he was ‘capable of allowing harm to come to one of his closest allies’ at the time.” This was Luna’s assessment of Trump’s response to the news that Mike Pence had to be evacuated from the Capitol, which ABC reported was “So what?”
AdvertisementABC also reported that Meadows filled in evidentiary gaps about information we had from public reporting. Meadows reportedly confirmed for Smith that he was present to hear Trump tell then–House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, “I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.”
AdvertisementMcCarthy, too, had refused to testify before the House Jan. 6 committee. He has never publicly acknowledged that Trump spoke those words to him on Jan. 6, and we don’t know whether he’s told Smith about hearing them.
Popular in News & Politics
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
- Why David Pecker’s Testimony Was So Credible
Meadows having done so also corroborates bombshell testimony that the House Jan. 6 committee received from Cassidy Hutchinson, Meadows’ aide—that during the early moments of violence on Jan. 6, she heard Meadows tell Pat Cipollone, the White House counsel, Trump “didn’t want to do anything” to stop it.
AdvertisementFinally, ABC reports notable evidence about Trump’s 6 p.m. tweet after the violence ended: “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is … viciously stripped away from great patriots…. Remember this day for forever!”
ABC reported that Trump posted the message despite Luna’s warning “that it made him sound ‘culpable’ for the violence, perhaps even as if he may have somehow been involved in ‘directing’ it.” Thus, he was on notice from a trusted ally that the message conveyed his criminal responsibility for the violence, and he published it anyway, demonstrating that it was no innocent mistake.
Advertisement AdvertisementOn Sunday, Trump’s team downplayed the significance of ABC’s blockbuster. A campaign spokesman said:
AdvertisementMedia fascination with second-hand hearsayshows just how weak the Witch-Hunt against President Trump is.”
This hearsay claim is 100 percent wrong. What witnesses told Trump and what he told them are not “hearsay” because the statements will not be offered in court to prove the truth of what they assert. Only statements offered for that purpose meet the legal definition of hearsay and are barred from being heard by jurors in criminal proceedings.
Take for example, Trump’s assertion to McCarthy that the Capitol invaders were “more concerned about the election” than he was. Smith would not offer that statement to prove its truth. Rather, Smith would offer the evidence to prove Trump’ criminal state of mind, a necessary element of every offense. Instead, the statement will be introduced to show that Trump wantedthe insurrection to continue and succeed in blocking the election certification.
The introduction of such testimony from Trump’s closest aides establishes his criminal intent and should seal his fate in the trial to come.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:关于我们)
- Prime exclusive deal: $50 off Govee floor lamp
- NK may run out of foreign currency in 2023: report
- I take my hat off to Hamilton, says old foe Rosberg
- Apple files DMCA takedown after iBoot source code hits GitHub
- Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
- How do you make safe, cheap nuclear reactors? Bury them a mile deep
- Kylie Jenner, MKBHD, Chrissy Teigen question Snapchat's redesign
- Arizona considers allowing tax payments in Bitcoin
- N. Korea set to raise tensions further with eye on US: experts
- Scientists detect water sloshing on Mars. There could be a lot.
- Spy agency warns North Korea plotting attacks on embassies
- Two foreigners test positive for virus days after arrival in Yangju
- ‘Man Utd forwards can be big threat’
-
AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods 4 may get revealed at the Apple September event
Apple just confirmedits annual big event, where the company releases its brand new iPhones, for Sept ...[详细] -
Trump’s voting fraud investigation is a great idea.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for a “major investigation” into voter fraud. While his t ...[详细] -
认捐一棵树只需5步!“我在雷高有棵树”认捐指南来了_南方+_南方plus【记者】黄旭君【来源】南方农村报【设计】王越 ...[详细]
-
Blockades, stun grenades, and anarchists abound at Trump inauguration protests in D.C.
On Friday morning, throngs of ticketholders to the inauguration of Donald Trump encountered a surpri ...[详细] -
How do you make safe, cheap nuclear reactors? Bury them a mile deep
Startup Deep Fission has come up with a new way to deal with the economic and safety problems of nuc ...[详细] -
What's coming to Netflix in April 2019
With the premieres of both Avengers: Endgameand Game of Thrones: Season 8 just weeks away, April is ...[详细] -
Why Theresa May needs Donald Trump to like her.
This can’t be a fun trip for Theresa May. As has been widely pointed out, the mild-mannered British ...[详细] -
Losing leg, winning gold: Story of para
AHMEDABAD:India's Manasi Joshi lost her leg in a horrific road accident, but found her calling - ...[详细] -
Carbon neutrality law violates basic rights: Constitutional Court
South Korea's carbon neutrality law does not conform with the Constitution because the absence ...[详细] -
How long would a liberal have to cry to fill up a Liberal Tears coffee mug?
By now you have probably seen the “liberal tears” coffee mug, a post–Donald Trump riff on the “male ...[详细]
- 22 Unusual Things You Can Find in the Desert
- North Korea denounces US aid to Ukraine as 'hallucinogen'
- Dude posts 'brilliant' Chipotle hack and gets mercilessly dragged on Twitter
- 推荐至农业农村部!“普薯32号”拟入选广东2024年农业主导品种
- 广东超一半的北运淡水鱼来自这里!全链发力打响“南海鱼”金字招牌
- Two foreigners test positive for virus days after arrival in Yangju
- Japan's outreach to N. Korea unlikely to affect trilateral cooperation against Pyongyang