Will the Neil Gorsuch pick exacerbate or help heal America’s deep divisions?
Given the dramatic and divisive start to Donald Trump’s president, Tuesday’s Supreme Court nomination announcement raises an interesting question: How does Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch heal or inflame America’s deep divisions? Here’s a quick scorecard.
On the divisions within the Republican Party, between Trump and the establishment.Trump picked from the establishment’s wish list, as promised. No prominent Republican officeholder has breathed a word of opposition.
On the divisions between coastal elites and the heartland.Gorsuch was educated at two of America’s finest coastal academies (Columbia University and Harvard Law School) but hails from the Rockies. Every single current justice went to Harvard or Yale Law, and Gorsuch is no different in this respect; but if confirmed, he would be refreshingly unique insofar as his home is not on or near an ocean.
On religious divisions.He diversifies but is also a throwback. “Making America Great Again” was in part a subliminal reaction to the utter absence of WASPs at the top of all three branches of government. In 2014, none of the nine justices was a Protestant (there were six Catholics and three Jews); and Congress was formally headed by Vice President Joe Biden (a Catholic), House Speaker John Boehner (another Catholic), and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (a Mormon). The only mainstream Protestant in the citadel’s top floor had the middle name “Hussein.” Today, both president and vice president are WASPs from mainstream denominations; so is Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, and Gorsuch would be the court’s first Protestant in seven years.
AdvertisementOn the divide between judges and politicos.Like all the current court members, Gorsuch is highly judicialized. In 1954, the bench that decided Brown v. Boardcontained only one justice who had been a federal judge before reaching the Supreme Court. Most of the justices in Brownwere former pols—governors, senators, Cabinet chiefs. By contrast, all of the current justices except Elena Kagan were sitting federal appellate judges when appointed; most served as judicial law clerks early in their careers; and two of the most recent appointees (John Roberts and Kagan) did multiple clerkships. Gorsuch outdoes them all in this department, having clerked for three judges (including two justices). If confirmed, he will be the first justice to sit alongside a former boss. Roberts succeeded his former boss, William Rehnquist, whereas Gorsuch will overlap with his, Anthony Kennedy. But here too Gorsuch is also a throwback. Although he himself never served in the Cabinet, his mother did. Perhaps this perspective—children learn what they live—may make him more wise to the ways of Washington than, for example, John Paul Stevens, or David Souter, or Sonia Sotomayor, or Kennedy, none of whom came to the court with any experience as a top-level D.C. insider or as a highly accomplished elected politician.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementOn the divide between Democrats and Republicans and between liberals and conservatives.This is the one area where things start to get sticky. Many Democrats remain irate that Merrick Garland never got a hearing. But even had Garland been heard, there was never a guarantee that he would have been confirmed. After all, the Republicans controlled the Senate. Gorsuch is clearly not the Democrats’ favorite Republican the way that Merrick Garland and Stephen Breyer were the Republicans’ favorite Democrats. He is not the reincarnation of Anthony Kennedy, whom Republican icon Ronald Reagan named in 1987 to placate Democrats after the disastrous Robert Bork nomination came crashing down. But Democrats controlled the Senate back then, and they do not today, so Trump can drive a harder bargain. And unlike some others on Trump’s short list, Gorsuch was unanimously confirmed for his lower-court seat. The first justice for whom he clerked, Byron White, was a Democrat appointed by a Democrat president (JFK) who chose to step down when another Democrat (Clinton) was in the White House. On the other hand, White was in certain ways a conservative Democrat, who dissented in Roe v. Wadeand penned the infamous anti-gay ruling in Bowers v. Hardwick. Antonin Scalia (whom Gorsuch has praised to the skies) wrote another famously anti-gay opinion (in dissent) in Romer v. Evans—a case from Gorsuch’s home state of Colorado. The majestic majority opinion was written by none other than Anthony Kennedy. Don’t be surprised if these two cases, featuring three Gorsuch mentors, loom especially large in the confirmation hearings ahead.
When pressed, will Gorsuch fudge or try to resist the tide of history on gay rights, à la White and Scalia; will he blandly acknowledge that same-sex rights are a fait accompli; or will he affirmatively embrace Kennedy’s bottom line by invoking originalist scholarship supportive of gay rights, by scholars such as Steven Calabresi (co-founder of the Federalist Society) and yours truly? Stay tuned. A great constitutional seminar awaits.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:产品中心)
- First officially approved Gen IV nuclear reactor in the US breaks ground
- Amazon's holiday toy catalog is an evil/genius way to make parents spend money
- Moon stresses alliance, seeks US state governors' support for Korea peace process
- Every single terrible hat Rory and Lorelai wore on 'Gilmore Girls'
- The local version of Project 2025 is already causing devastation.
- North Korea says it conducted important test to develop multiple warhead missile
- Amazon selects New York and Northern Virginia for its 'second headquarters'
- 这一次,我们把最地道的新疆羊肉带来了| 南疆风物志⑤
- US Treasury says it will continue to use financial sanctions against N. Korea
- 7 Reasons to Explore Boston’s Lesser
- Bayern Munich confirm Leroy Sane signing from Man City
- Essential's $149 magnetic dongle will bring back your headphone jack
- Elon Musk's 'Teslaquila' trademark opposed by Mexican tequila industry
-
Jess McAllen ,July 25, 2024 Value Judgment ...[详细]
-
Trump calls Clinton a "monster," suggests she is "brainwashed."
As Donald Trump faces troubles in the polls and within his own party, the Republican presidential ca ...[详细] -
Facebook is sending Jewish New Year messages to people who aren't Jewish
UPDATE: Sept. 21, 2017, 1:03 p.m. EDT Updated with a response from Facebook.As much as Facebook oste ...[详细] -
[Meet the diplomat] No changes for the time being: UK envoy
The UK has left the EU as of Jan. 31, but its trade with South Korea will see no major changes, the ...[详细] -
SCOTUS: The courts implementing Project 2025, without Trump.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to allow a new rule issued by the Department of Educat ...[详细] -
Every single terrible hat Rory and Lorelai wore on 'Gilmore Girls'
Gilmore Girlswas one of the few shows on television that featured discernible changes in season. And ...[详细] -
Hublot's new watch is a perfect fit for Bitcoin millionaires
Here's something you can proudly wear to you next cryptocurrency yacht cruise. Swiss luxury watch ma ...[详细] -
At least 13 killed in France birthday celebration.
A birthday cake with candles and sparklers turned deadly early Saturday morning when it fell to the ...[详细] -
8月26日,市委书记夏凤俭在雅与四川建安工业有限责任公司董事长耿海波一行座谈。双方分别介绍了雅安经济社会发展情况和企业生产经营情况,围绕推动企业科技创新、扩大投资布局、做强产业集群、开拓市场空间等方面 ...[详细]
-
Trump calls Clinton a "monster," suggests she is "brainwashed."
As Donald Trump faces troubles in the polls and within his own party, the Republican presidential ca ...[详细]
- Apple's iPhone 17 will come with a huge RAM upgrade, report claims
- Facebook is sending Jewish New Year messages to people who aren't Jewish
- 项目促进资源转化 合作实现互利共赢
- Elon Musk's 'Teslaquila' trademark opposed by Mexican tequila industry
- Garmin Fenix 8 vs. Apple Watch Ultra: The Fenix wins big on battery life
- 扶贫攻坚 第一书记到地头
- 积极争先 争做知识小能手