What Apple's Supreme Court case means for the future of the App Store
Apple's App Store rules are about to come under a lot more scrutiny and that could be bad news for the company.
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that a group of consumers cansue Apple over App Store rules they say are anti-competitive. The groups who brought the suit say that because Apple's rules prevent apps from being distributed outside of the App Store, it creates a monopoly that lets Apple jack up the price of software in its store.
Now, although the latest decision was merely a procedural win -- Apple's lawyers had argued the case should be thrown out -- the fact that the case will move forward could eventually have significant implications for the App Store.
And, at a time when more and more officials are calling for the break-up of Big Tech, the fact that the court green-lit the case could be a worrying sign.
What could happen?
The original suit in the case dates back to 2011, so it's important to note that the Supreme Court decision is unlikely to change anything in the short term. If both sides opt to litigate, it could be another years-long legal battle. Apple could also decide to settle, much like it did in the Qualcomm case.
So while it's impossible to say exactly how this will play out, there are a few areas where Apple could, eventually, be forced to change its rules.
One scenario is that Apple could be forced to allow users to install apps from outside of the App Store, what's sometimes called "sideloading." This would be one of the more extreme outcomes, as it would mean the end of the company's so-called "walled garden." Apple has always been loath to do this, and has actually gone out of its way to punish developers who try to skirt its rules, going so far as to break all of Facebook's internal apps when it got wind of the company's attempts to "research" teens internet habits.
Apple often cites security reasons for this -- it can't guarantee that software outside of its App Store is safe -- but there's another huge reason why it wants to control app distribution: money. Apple takes a 30 percent cut of app sales and in-app purchases which, of course, it controls. If it were forced to allow other app stores, or let developers sell apps directly to users, it could potentially lose out on a significant amount of revenue.
Tweet may have been deleted
The same goes for in-app purchases. Because Apple requires all in-app purchases to be conducted through the App Store, developers automatically lose out on 30 percent, which is why some developers have tried to buck the App Store. This is why you can't buy Kindle books in Amazon's iOS app, for example, and Netflix no longer lets you sign up for its service in its app.
So another potential outcome of the case could be that Apple will have to allow alternative methods for in-app purchases. This is the scenario that some pundits think is most likely, as it would satisfy some critics without fundamentally changing how Apple monetizes apps.
Apple could also theoretically be forced to change the amount it takes from developers. Instead of the 30 percent commission it gets now, it could be that a lower amount would be deemed more "competitive." But this seems less likely as Google also takes a 30 percent cut from its developers' app sales.
None of it is great for Apple
But we do know the Supreme Court decision is a blow to Apple. Quite simply, the App Store business is critical to Apple. That's long been the case, but as iPhone sales have slowed, the company has been trying to transition to a "services" focused business. (The company's last major event saw the launch of three new subscription services in gaming, news, and streaming.)
As the company attempts to get these new services off the ground, the App Store makes up a significant chunk of Apple's services revenue (which was $11.5 billion last quarter). If the company was forced to allow apps to be distributed by third-parties, or to loosen its grip on in-app purchases, for example, it could have a significant impact on that business.
Featured Video For You
Apple and Disney donate to help rebuild Notre-Dame Cathedral
TopicsApple
(责任编辑:关于我们)
-
US to oppose North Korean worker dispatch to occupied Ukrainian territory: State Dept.
Spokeperson for the State Department Matthew Miller speaks during a press briefing in Washington, D. ...[详细] -
...[详细]
-
□史洪举近日,拍摄并造谣“肉松蛋糕是棉花做的”视频的两名青岛大妈被警察抓起来了。5月22日,黄某在山东青岛费县路某糕点店购买肉松蛋糕等糕点,到王某家串门,俩人联想到网上看到的“棉花肉松”视频,便清洗蛋 ...[详细]
-
雅安日报/北纬网讯今5)日,2017环境日主题宣传活动在市文化中心广场举行。今年是我国第三个环境日,本次主题是“绿水青山就是金山银山”,并号召大家“以生命共同体理念,保护山水林田湖”。本次主题宣传活动 ...[详细]
-
Webb telescope discovers 6 rogue worlds. They didn't form the way you'd expect.
Sometimes, planets go rogue. Scientists used the powerful James Webb Space Telescope to spot six of ...[详细] -
女贞尺蛾又叫女贞尺蠖读音:huo四声),其幼虫在丝网内群居取食叶片,重者可将植株叶片食光,使枝梢枯死,甚至整枯死。每年4月上旬,女贞尺蛾越冬幼虫随寄主萌芽逐渐复苏。白天气温高时,爬出网巢取食。4月中旬 ...[详细]
-
以眼作秤,最小误差仅25克!三角生鱼相鱼高手赛决出_南方+_南方plus2月24日,“三角生鱼杯”相鱼高手赛在中山市三角镇举办,作为2024三角生鱼美食文化嘉年华中的重磅活动,吸引了20名选手参赛以及 ...[详细]
-
从8月11日开始,雅安仁康医院推出了一项优厚措施——凡在仁康医院治疗过结石的患者,均可前来做彩超检查,挂号费、检查费全免。此项惠及老结石病人的工作刚开始一个星期,已为130多人进行了免费彩超检查,查出 ...[详细]
-
Pressure boost squeezes out more hydrogen from artificial leaves
Hydrogen-producing artificial leaves might soon be even better at their jobs thanks to a new study t ...[详细] -
速看!广东省“交旅融合发展”十佳及典型案例拟入选名单公示_南方+_南方plus1月29日,广东省文化和旅游厅公示广东省“交旅融合发展”十佳案例和典型案例拟入选名单。据悉,该评选活动在自愿申报,地市文化 ...[详细]