Why Trump stopped saying “radical Islamic terrorism.”
On his trip to Saudi Arabia this week, President Trump talked a lot about religious violence. But he never uttered one of his favorite phrases: “radical Islamic terrorism.” The omission sparked chatter about why he dropped the term and whether this portended a policy shift in the Middle East. On those questions, let’s wait and see. But Trump’s switch does clarify one thing: Presidents who refuse to associate Islam with terrorism aren’t being stupid. They’re being prudent.
As a presidential candidate, Trump claimed that when President Obama and Hillary Clinton avoided language about Islamic violence, they weren’t just being cowardly or dishonest. He suggested that they didn’t use the phrase “radical Islamic terrorism” because they didn’t understand the connection between terrorism and its religious context. Clinton “has no clue what radical Islam is,” Trump asserted after last year’s terror attack in Orlando. “She is in total denial … When it comes to radical Islamic terrorism, ignorance is not bliss—it’s deadly.” Several of Trump’s Republican presidential rivals—Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, Rick Santorum—agreed that Obama and Clinton didn’t get it.
Other Republicans disagreed. Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, and Lindsey Graham shared Trump’s distaste for Obama’s and Clinton’s policies. But these Republicans said it was wise to distinguish Islam from terror. “Presidents can’t just say anything they want. It has consequences, here and around the world,” Rubio explained during a primary debate. “We’re going to have to work with the Jordanian kingdom. We’re going to have to work with the Saudis. We’re going to have to work with the Gulf kingdoms. We’re going to have to work with the Egyptians … We are going to have to work with people of the Muslim faith, even as Islam itself faces a serious crisis within it of radicalization.”
AdvertisementThat’s exactly how Obama and Clinton explained their thinking. They saw how much murder was being committed in Islam’s name. They refused to echo that language, precisely because they understood that the goal of Muslim terrorists was to persuade other Muslims that Islam sanctioned terrorism. But this line of thinking by Obama and Clinton was lost on—or ignored by—conservative pundits and politicians. During the campaign, friends of mine seriously asked whether Obama understood the relationship between Islam and terrorism.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThanks to Trump’s Middle Eastern trip, I no longer have to defend Obama’s judgment. I can point instead to Trump. He has come around, in effect, to Obama’s position. Speaking in Saudi Arabia on Sunday, Trump replaced his previous talk of “radical Islamic terrorism” with Obama-esque denunciations of “extremism” and “violent ideology.” “This is not a battle between different faiths,” said Trump. He noted that by some estimates, “more than 95 percent of the victims of terrorism are themselves Muslim.”
AdvertisementTrump’s reversal wasn’t just a matter of politeness while visiting a Muslim country. Two days later, he stood next to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem. Netanyahu called on America and Israel to “defeat the forces of militant Islam.” Trump, despite the previous day’s terror attack in Manchester, eschewed such language. Like Clinton and Obama, Trump spoke of Muslims as partners: “I call upon all people—Jews, Christians, Muslims, and every faith, every tribe, every creed—to draw inspiration from this ancient city, to set aside our sectarian differences, to overcome oppression and hatred, and to give all children the freedom and hope and dignity written into our souls.”
AdvertisementWhy did Trump talk this way? For the same reason Obama and Clinton did. In an interview previewing the trip, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster signaled that one of the administration’s goals was to thwart terrorists who invoked the name of Islam. McMaster called them “irreligious criminals who use a perverted interpretation of religion to advance their criminal and political agendas.” Trump, in his remarks on the Manchester attack, called the perpetrators “losers,” explaining: “I won’t call them monsters, because they would like that term. They would think that’s a great name.” It’s hard to believe that this rationale—refusing to call terrorists what they want to be called—didn’t play a role, as well, in Trump’s newfound unwillingness to describe them as Islamic.
Trump hasn’t suddenly become wise, decent, or enlightened. If he thinks that railing against “radical Islamic terrorism” will help him politically, he’ll go right back to it. But his decision to drop such language—at least as a strategic gesture to Muslim governments—shows that he understands why it’s smart to avoid speaking that way, or that McMaster has convinced him for now. So let’s stop pretending that presidents who avoid associating terrorism with Islam are being naïve. Because now, when Republicans say that, the president they’re calling naïve is Trump.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:关于我们)
-
Webb scientists haven't found a rocky world with air. But now they have a plan.
Perhaps surprisingly, the majority of stars in the galaxy are not sunclones but smaller orbs of gas ...[详细] -
中国山东网—感知山东5月29日讯 5月27日上午,青岛市市北区妈祖文化交流协会成立大会举行。原青岛市政协主席胡延森、山东省妈祖文化交流协会会长赵起良、青岛市政协专职常委、民盟市委副主委韩文 ...[详细]
-
“旭妹儿,今天又来给大家帮忙哦?”“旭妹儿,这段时间辛苦了!”9月14日一早,市委老干部活动中心副主任周旭又继续前往石棉县王岗坪乡挖角村4组,帮助受灾村民搬运危房财物,并对即将拆除的危房进行拍照存档。 ...[详细]
-
鏉庡畤鏄ャ€佸惔浜﹀嚒銆佹潕鑽f旦鈥︹€?020闈掑矝鍑ゅ嚢闊充箰鑺?0鏈?鏃?3鏃ラ潚宀涜タ娴峰哺鏂板尯寮€鍞盻涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
銆€銆€9鏈?鏃ワ紝璁拌€呬粠鏂伴椈鍙戝竷浼氫笂鑾锋倝锛屼互“鏃跺皻瑗挎捣宀搞€佷箰鐪嬫柊鏃朵唬”涓轰富棰樼殑2020闈掑矝鍑ゅ嚢闊充箰鑺傚皢浜?0鏈?鏃?3鏃ュ湪闈掑矝瑗挎捣 ...[详细] -
By a technicality, August's full moon is blue. Here's why.
There's supposedly nothing special about a blue moon. A full moon is just a moon phase, and a blue m ...[详细] -
中国山东网—感知山东6月29日讯6月29日,由平度市文化和旅游局、平度市经济开发区管委会主办的“平度记忆”——曲刚镜头里的平度四十年纪实摄影 ...[详细]
-
本报讯8日下午,雅安市军队离退休干部休养所举行2022年中秋座谈会,近百名军休干部及退休职工齐聚一堂,话团圆畅想未来,共庆佳节。座谈会上,雅安市军队离退休干部休养所向全体军休干部及退休职工发出倡议,号 ...[详细]
-
中国山东网-感知山东7月28日讯 海风飘飘、光影闪耀、舞台火爆、啤酒烧烤……酷暑之下,西部老城消费市场迎来“甘霖”。本届啤酒节统筹推进疫情防控和经济 ...[详细]
-
Carbon neutrality law violates basic rights: Constitutional Court
South Korea's carbon neutrality law does not conform with the Constitution because the absence ...[详细] -
首创“四连冠”!招行再度荣膺《欧洲货币》“中国最佳银行”大奖
7月14日,国际权威媒体《欧洲货币》(Euromoney)在其官网揭晓“2022年卓越大奖”评选结果,招商银行继2019年、2020年和2021年后第四年荣膺“中国 ...[详细]